early versus late decompression for traumatic spinal cord injuries; a systematic review and meta-analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
introduction: despite the vast number of surveys, no consensus has been reached on the optimum timing of spinal decompression surgery. this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of early and late spinal decompression surgery on neurologic improvement and post-surgical complications in patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries. methods: two independent reviewers carried out an extended search in electronic databases. data of neurological outcome and post-surgery complication were extracted. finally, pooled relative risk (rr) with a 95% confidence interval (ci) was reported for comparing of efficacy of early and late surgical decompression. results: eventually 22 studies were included. the pooled rr was 0.77 (95% ci: 0.68-0.89) for at least one grade neurological improvement, and 0.84 (95% ci: 0.77-0.92) for at least two grade improvement. pooled rr for surgical decompression performed within 12 hours after the injury was 0.26 (95% ci: 0.13-0.52; p<0.001), while it was 0.75 (95% ci: 0.63-0.90; p=0.002) when the procedure was performed within 24 hours, and 0.93 (95% ci: 0.76-1.14; p=0.48) when it was carried out in the first 72 hours after the injury. surgical decompression performed within 24 hours after injury was found to be associated with significantly lower rates of post-surgical complications (rr=0.77; 95% ci: 0.68-0.86; p<0.001). conclusion: the findings of this study indicate that early spinal decompression surgery can improve neurologic recovery and is associated with less post-surgical complications. the optimum efficacy is observed when the procedure is performed within 12 hours of the injury. introduction: despite the vast number of surveys, no consensus has been reached on the optimum timing of spinal decompression surgery. this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of early and late spinal decompression surgery on neurologic improvement and post-surgical complications in patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries. methods: two independent reviewers carried out an extended search in electronic databases. data of neurological outcome and post-surgery complication were extracted. finally, pooled relative risk (rr) with a 95% confidence interval (ci) was reported for comparing of efficacy of early and late surgical decompression. results: eventually 22 studies were included. the pooled rr was 0.77 (95% ci: 0.68-0.89) for at least one grade neurological improvement, and 0.84 (95% ci: 0.77-0.92) for at least two grade improvement. pooled rr for surgical decompression performed within 12 hours after the injury was 0.26 (95% ci: 0.13-0.52; p<0.001), while it was 0.75 (95% ci: 0.63-0.90; p=0.002) when the procedure was performed within 24 hours, and 0.93 (95% ci: 0.76-1.14; p=0.48) when it was carried out in the first 72 hours after the injury. surgical decompression performed within 24 hours after injury was found to be associated with significantly lower rates of post-surgical complications (rr=0.77; 95% ci: 0.68-0.86; p<0.001). conclusion: the findings of this study indicate that early spinal decompression surgery can improve neurologic recovery and is associated with less post-surgical complications. the optimum efficacy is observed when the procedure is performed within 12 hours of the injury.
منابع مشابه
Early versus late spinal decompression surgery in treatment of traumatic spinal cord injuries; a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION Despite the vast number of surveys, no consensus has been reached on the optimum timing of spinal decompression surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of early and latespinal decompression surgery on neurologic improvement and post-surgical complications in patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries. METHODS Two independent reviewers carr...
متن کاملChondroitinase ABC Administration in Locomotion Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Introduction: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to conduct a comprehensive and complete search of electronic resources to investigate the role of administrating Chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) in improving complications following Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI). Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Sciences databases were searched until the end of 2019. Two independent reviewe...
متن کاملClinical outcome of autologous mononuclear cells transplantation for spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background :Cell-based therapies can be used to treat neurological diseases and spinal cord injuries. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of bone marrow derived mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) transplantation in patients with spinal cord injuries. Method s: Following a systematic review to detect clinical intervention studies, a meta-analysis was done for pooling data to es...
متن کاملInterspinous process spacers versus traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND Interspinous spacers are used in selected patients for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. The uses of interspinous devices are still debated, with reports of significantly higher reoperation rates and unfavourable cost-effectiveness compared to traditional decompression techniques. METHODS Six electronic databases were searched from their date of inception to December 2015. R...
متن کاملThe fate of neurons after traumatic spinal cord injury in rats: A systematic review
Objective(s): To reach an evidence-based knowledge in the context of the temporal-spatial pattern of neuronal death and find appropriate time of intervention in order to preserve spared neurons and promote regeneration after traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI). Materials and Methods: The study design was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-guided...
متن کاملEvidence-based evaluation of early versus late surgical decompression in cervical spinal cord injury
© 2015 Asian Journal of Neurosurgery | Published by Wolters Kluwer ‐ Medknow Mahdi Sharif-Alhoseini, Alexander Vaccaro, Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Address for corresp...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
emergency journalجلد ۴، شماره ۰۹، صفحات ۰-۰
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023